insert-msql-Linux_2.2.10_i686-cmp-msql,mysql
上传用户:romrleung
上传日期:2022-05-23
资源大小:18897k
文件大小:4k
源码类别:
MySQL数据库
开发平台:
Visual C++
- Testing server 'mSQL server version 2.0.10' at 1999-09-23 8:59:18
- Testing the speed of inserting data into 1 table and do some selects on it.
- The tests are done with a table that has 100000 rows.
- Generating random keys
- Creating tables
- Inserting 100000 rows in order
- Inserting 100000 rows in reverse order
- Inserting 100000 rows in random order
- Time for insert (300000): 105 wallclock secs (37.17 usr 6.05 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing insert of duplicates
- Time for insert_duplicates (300000): 20 wallclock secs ( 7.44 usr 1.70 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Retrieving data from the table
- Time for select_big (10:3000000): 106 wallclock secs (63.07 usr 14.60 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Time for order_by_key (10:3000000): 138 wallclock secs (62.91 usr 14.50 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Time for order_by (10:3000000): 137 wallclock secs (62.94 usr 14.03 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Time for select_diff_key (500:1000): 143 wallclock secs ( 0.52 usr 0.04 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Note: Query took longer then time-limit: 600
- Estimating end time based on:
- 290 queries in 290 loops of 5000 loops took 602 seconds
- Estimated time for select_range_prefix (5000:3654): 10379 wallclock secs ( 7.41 usr 0.69 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Note: Query took longer then time-limit: 600
- Estimating end time based on:
- 300 queries in 300 loops of 5000 loops took 610 seconds
- Estimated time for select_range (5000:3780): 10166 wallclock secs ( 7.83 usr 0.67 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Note: Query took longer then time-limit: 600
- Estimating end time based on:
- 3034 queries in 1517 loops of 100000 loops took 601 seconds
- Estimated time for select_key_prefix (200000): 39617 wallclock secs (190.51 usr 18.46 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Time for select_key (200000): 244 wallclock secs (177.74 usr 12.56 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Test of compares with simple ranges
- Note: Query took longer then time-limit: 600
- Estimating end time based on:
- 2240 queries in 56 loops of 500 loops took 603 seconds
- Estimated time for select_range_prefix (20000:4872): 5383 wallclock secs ( 9.46 usr 1.61 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Note: Query took longer then time-limit: 600
- Estimating end time based on:
- 2200 queries in 55 loops of 500 loops took 602 seconds
- Estimated time for select_range (20000:4785): 5472 wallclock secs (10.27 usr 0.64 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing update of keys in loops
- Time for update_of_key (599999): 220 wallclock secs (104.21 usr 15.51 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing update with key
- Time for update_with_key (100000): 57942 wallclock secs (46.67 usr 8.71 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing update of all rows
- Time for update_big (500): 73 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing delete
- Time for delete_key (500): 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Time for delete_big (12): 10 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Insert into table with 5 keys and with a primary key with 5 parts
- Time for insert_key (100000): 40 wallclock secs (12.67 usr 2.51 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Testing update of keys
- Time for update_of_primary_key_many_keys (256): 634 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Deleting everything from table
- Time for delete_big_many_keys (2): 676 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)
- Estimated total time: 131515 wallclock secs (800.98 usr 112.30 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.00 CPU)